亚洲不卡一区二区av,国产精品乱一区二区三区,另类亚洲综合区图片小说区,99人妻精品日韩欧美一区二区`

位置:首頁(yè) >工程技術(shù) >交通運(yùn)輸科學(xué)與技術(shù) >EUROPEAN TRANSPORT RESEARCH REVIEW >Urban (UMaaS) and rural (RMaaS) mobility as a service (MaaS): practical insights from international practitioners and experts

城市 (UMaaS) 和農(nóng)村 (RMaaS) 出行即服務(wù) (MaaS):國(guó)際從業(yè)者和專家的實(shí)用見解

Urban (UMaaS) and rural (RMaaS) mobility as a service (MaaS): practical insights from international practitioners and experts

作者:Jenny Milne;Mark Beecroft;John D. Nelson;Philip Greening;Caitlin Cottrill;Steve Wright;

發(fā)表時(shí)間:2024年

  • 文獻(xiàn)詳情
  • 相似文獻(xiàn)

摘要

近十年來(lái),移動(dòng)即服務(wù) (MaaS) 的概念和潛力一直是學(xué)術(shù)界和工業(yè)界爭(zhēng)論的焦點(diǎn)。全球有多個(gè)基于城市的移動(dòng)即服務(wù) (MaaS) 試點(diǎn)。 MaaS 的實(shí)踐證據(jù)仍然嚴(yán)重缺乏,其重點(diǎn)是基于城市的解決方案,而不是農(nóng)村和郊區(qū)。為此,本文提出了四個(gè)研究問(wèn)題,以縮小農(nóng)村 MaaS (RMaaS) 和城市 MaaS (UMaaS) 之間的差距;首先,鑒于科學(xué)文獻(xiàn)中已確定的證據(jù),MaaS 是否是農(nóng)村地區(qū)的出行選擇?其次,考慮到措辭、地理位置、可用模式、交通、起源和實(shí)施階段等因素,從業(yè)者對(duì) MaaS(所有領(lǐng)域)的體驗(yàn)有何不同?第三,從該領(lǐng)域的從業(yè)者那里可以汲取哪些實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)?第四,MaaS在農(nóng)村和城市地區(qū)的未來(lái)是什么。該研究和調(diào)查結(jié)果基于灰色文獻(xiàn)以及對(duì)研究或政府組織、公共機(jī)構(gòu)、MaaS 技術(shù)供應(yīng)商、運(yùn)輸運(yùn)營(yíng)商和專家代表的 20 次半結(jié)構(gòu)化訪談。每位參與者都討論了 MaaS 在城市、區(qū)域或農(nóng)村地區(qū)的實(shí)際應(yīng)用并做出了貢獻(xiàn)。該分析產(chǎn)生了 2 個(gè)應(yīng)用工具,對(duì)于對(duì) MaaS 感興趣的從業(yè)者來(lái)說(shuō)非常有用;專題地圖可視化圍繞“人員、政策、實(shí)踐和試點(diǎn)(4P)”的采訪中出現(xiàn)的常見問(wèn)題;實(shí)施 MaaS 工具的實(shí)用框架,任何從業(yè)者都可以在 MaaS 項(xiàng)目的任何階段使用它。


Abstract

The concept and potential of Mobility as a Service (MaaS) has been the subject of significant debate in academia and industry for nearly a decade. There are several city-based Mobility as a Service (MaaS) pilots globally. There remains a significant lack of practitioner evidence of MaaS with the focus on city-based solutions rather than in rural and suburban areas. To that end, this paper asks four research questions to contribute to the gap in Rural MaaS (RMaaS) and Urban MaaS (UMaaS); firstly, is MaaS a mobility option for rural areas given the identified evidence in scientific literature? Secondly, how do practitioner experiences with MaaS (in all areas) differ considering factors like phraseology, geography, available modes, transportation, the origin and implementation stages? Thirdly, what practical learnings can be drawn from practitioners in the field? Fourthly, what is the future of MaaS for rural and urban areas. The research and findings are based upon grey literature and twenty semi-structured interviews with representatives from research or government organisations, public bodies, MaaS technology suppliers, transport operators and experts. Each participant discussed and contributed to the practicalities around real-world applications of MaaS in urban, regional, or rural areas. The analysis produced 2 applied tools which will be useful to practitioners interested in MaaS; a Thematic Map visualising the common matters emerging from the interviews revolving around ‘People, Policy, Practice and Pilots (4Ps); a Practical Framework for Implementing MaaS tool, which can be used by any practitioner at any stage of a MaaS project.